Total Pageviews

Sunday, 21 May 2023

BEYOND WEB AND WEBB




In a continuation of my Outline for a Personal Catechism (6 July 2021), this is an attempt to understand theological cosmology in Christian terms, continuing the concepts and phenomena of the Ascension. Given the current knowledge of the physical universe, with its thousands of trillions of stars and planets, a cosmological conception of Heaven is not really viable. It seems more reasonable to postulate the existence of another dimension to which we may apply the Biblical term “heaven” and which is the dwelling of the Deity. In this dimension neither time as we know it nor space as we know it exist. Its equivalent of “time” is what we know as “eternity”. It may well have an equivalent of “space”-- which is very faintly suggested by expressions such as “sitteth on the right hand of God” and “in my Father’s house are many mansions”--, but we do not know it. This dimension, “Heaven”, is not accessible to our five senses: it cannot be seen, heard, touched, smelled or tasted. It is accessible through prayer (and perhaps through meditation). Its cartographers are the systematic theologians; its explorers are the mystics. Apart from the Trinity (and perhaps the Blessed Virgin Mary), its inhabitants are of several kinds: angels, saints, and the faithful departed.

            The shape of the inhabitants is not readily imaginable. The likelihood of angels’ resembling adult humans with wings is small. And we know little of the “glorious body”  that is promised to the faithful for their future: even the perfectly tangible body Jesus assumed between His Resurrection and His Ascension was a temporary affair. (And note that He was not physically recognisable even to his intimate followers.) The heavenly body of the saints and faithful departed may or may not resemble what they inhabited on earth: we have no way of knowing. Given the diversity of fates that their earthly bodies met, a formal reconstruction of decayed matter seems improbable. On the other hand, we are told that they are very much their individual selves, and recognisable by loved ones. Again, this suggests a different dimension with completely different forms of life, yet with a fundamental connection to humanity.

            All Biblical scholarship and theology tells us that “eternal life” is not simply life prolonged to temporal infinity. Some explanations lead me to think that the authors are trying to prepare us for a future without life after death; yet Jesus leads us to believe otherwise --  see his words ot the Good Thief. We may perhaps imagine that “eternal life” is life in that dimension called Heaven, where there is no time

            When the resurrected Jesus, after forty days on earth with his friends, is “taken up into heaven” in front of their eyes, what may we imagine actually happened? I suspect that, as their conception of Heaven was spatial, His sudden disppearance was seen by their eyes as having an aspect of “up-ness”, of a rising diagonal or even a vertical. In fact, we may assume, it was a move outward, or inward, (back) to that other dimension we call Heaven, where he came “home” to his Father; a dimension not accessible to our, or the disciples’, eyesight.

 

There are other words that give us earthlings trouble when we try to understand or visualise them. “Glory” is one. If we translate it as the honour or fame that heroes or great athletes reap, its theological meanings are odd and unlikely. It is perhaps better approached by way of John Keats’s vision of Madeline in “The Eve of St Agnes”: “Rose-bloom fell on her hands, together prest,And on her silver cross soft amethyst,And on her hair a glory, like a saint”. The glory here is a sort of halo, a glow that surrounds her head. If we can understand such a glow as not outwardly surrounding but emanating from an inwardness, then at least the terrestrial part of “heaven and earth are full of thy glory” becomes clearer. And it is thus perhaps that we can detect one of the connecting spaces or routes between our earth and that other dimension, “Heaven”.

            Another such word is”peace”. To us it is usually either the absence of war or a condition of inner quiet and comfort. But that makes its use in the Gospels distinctly peculiar. When Jesus says “Peace I leave unto you, my peace I give unto you”; and when he tells the apostles upon entering a house to say “peace be upon this house” but if they are not received then that peace will come back to them; we are left wondering. Part of the answer lies in the Hebrew word shalom, which has a much wider meaning than our “peace”: it describes a kind of universal, even cosmic, harmony, where everyone and everything is in their proper place and fulfilling their proper function, in a joyful co-operation. And Jesus seems to use it in an almost local way, as if it is a something that can be bestowed -- or taken back. 

 

Both “glory” and “peace”, then, are words that belong to our languages here on Earth, but which have a dusting of Heaven still upon and within them. And as such they help us to add to our very partial understanding of that dimension, I should almost say, that parallel universe. In that dimension – we’re tempted to call it a place or a space, because it’s hard to imagine a dimension without space as we know it – in that dimension glory and peace are part of the atmosphere the inhabitants breathe. 

            It may  be the same with all the Biblical expressions of “joy” and “exultation” which look so odd in our fallen and embattled world. In the dimension we may call Heaven it is possible that they are part of the atmosphere, part of the weather. 

            The more we go into this territory of thought, the more we learn about our world, our life, and their relation to the “land”, the dimension, of which we are supposedly also the autochthonous citizens. And when we complain morosely that “heaven and earth are full of thy glory” seems like a cruel joke in the presence of the Russian army and drowning migrants, what we should understand is perhaps that the glory is there -- but too often ignored and trampled underfoot by the human race in all its brutish and brutal sinfulness, in its uncaring search for diversion and distraction, and in its passion for domination, prohibition and the bitter ashes of false victory.

 

Image: "Heaven and earth are full of thy glory"


 

Sunday, 7 May 2023

FILLING IT FULL



 

The verb “fulfil” is interesting. It means “to complete” something, to add a missing element and thus to make something whole. In some ways it is a cousin to the verb “to perfect”. One can fulfil an expectation; one can fulfil a promise; one can fulfil a prophecy.

 

“I have not come to abolish the law and the prophets, but to fulfil them.” (Mt 5:17)

 

Yeshua’s interpretation of the Meshiach’s task is one of inwardness. The Law gave people (individuals and the community both) ten commandments and 613 regulations to observe, in order to present themselves worthily before God. Obviously, this required much study and practice: as Psalm 19 says, “Who can tell how oft he offendeth? O cleanse thou me from my secret faults.”  

            Yeshua, steeped in the Psalms and in the Prophets, notably Isaiah, seems to have pondered this and concluded that another way was possible. After all, what was the Law for? It existed to bring God and man together again, to re-bind (re-ligare) their bond. Might there not be a way to do this more purely as well as more expeditiously? Not by abolishing and replacing the Law: that would be blasphemous, as it had been given by God through Moses. On the other hand, achieving the Law’s aim more directly would, as it were, “fulfil” it, accomplish its purpose more simply as well as more purely. After all, it is possible to live a perfectly kosher life respecting the commandments and still have a mind full of resentment. 

            So he reduced the ten commandments to two: thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all they heart and all thy soul and all thy mind and all thy strength, and thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. I have written previously (1 September 2022) about the seeming oddity of joining the injunction of ‘thou shalt’ with the verb ‘love’; here what is important is that if you live those two forms of love completely and wholeheartedly, none of the other commandments are relevant. And this is all the more true concerning the 613 rules: if you live the second commandment fully enough to enable you to live the first, and live the first completely, then in that love between you and God the 613 rules are completely fulfilled.

            Ah, says Rabbi Neusner[1], but you are forgetting Shabbat. That is a commandment not so much for the individual but for the community, for the community of the people of Israel. However much you, as an individual, love your Father in Heaven, that does not exempt you from observing Shabbat with your family, your clan, your town. 

            And just as that was for Neusner the point where, regretfully, he parted company with Yeshua, so it is the point where the followers of Yeshua Meshiach part company with the Rabbi. Because now we come up against a further huge step in the evolution of the Meshiach. Yeshua, the man from Nazareth, had interpreted the Meshiach’s task as fulfilling the Law by creating a direct route from the human heart to God. Now, however, he has become, he is, that Meshiach, and as such he gradually goes much further. 

            First of all, he (not man in general, but he) is “Lord of the Sabbath”. Once again, he looks for the purpose: what is the observance of the Sabbath for? And he concludes that it exists to bring the people closer to their God. Shabbat is made for man: not man for Shabbat. Meaning: man is made to be with God; if there is a better, more direct, more inward (note: not easier!) way for man to come closer to God on the special day of the week than observing rules about eating wheat tops or activating a light switch, then man should choose that. 

            Next: he has always read Isaiah; now he is coming to see that Isaiah’s relevance is complete and direct: the Suffering Servant is not the People of Israel but the Anointed One himself. It is he who will take upon him the sin of the world; it is he who, alone, will face the measureless evil that is its consequence; it is he who will be at the same time the High Priest and the High Priest’s sacrificial lamb; and on the third day, he rose again from the dead. 

            So, as he has taught men to “fulfil” the Law, he himself “fulfils” the Scriptures – he gives them, retrospectively if not retroactively, their ultimate meaning. 



[1] Jacob Neusner, A Rabbi Talks With Jesus, Doubleday 1993.

Monday, 1 May 2023

A SECRET IMMENSITY







“Your life is hid with Christ in God.” (Colossians 3:3)

 

This saying is of measureless profundity. We live several lives simultaneously. Our daily life with its tasks and pleasures and frustrations and pains; our emotional life with its joys and griefs; our intellectual life with its searches and discoveries; and our religious life, our life as a child of God. This last is too often neglected as it does not, like daily life, obtrude and trip us up. But it is our absolute life, the breath of ultimate life, love, sin and death. And as we grow, in age but also in the questioning of our place in the scheme of things, it is of this life that the importance swells and increases. And it is there that one day we confront this saying, telling us that our life is hid with Christ in God. 

            At first sight it seems absolutely mysterious and incomprehensible. So, to understand it, let us turn to that Doctor Ecclesiæ, Josef Ratzinger, alias Benedict XVI. In the second volume of his Jesus of Nazareth, he explains the necessity and the immensity of Jesus’ Passion and of the Cross. In the Cross, he says, God opens himself completely to man, makes himself definitively accessible in an act of ultimate love. And this complete and utter gift that took place once, in real historical time and in a real geographical place, is still taking place: it is repeated in each Mass and Communion. 

            This is stupendous and very nearly beyond understanding, if we take it seriously and try to get our mind and soul around it. It explains that other saying, “I am with you till the end of time” (Matthew 28:20). And if we keep it in mind when we reread that saying in Colossians, we realise that this truth is true in both directions: he is with us till the end of time, but we are also with him. 

            After the interim period of his appearances following the Resurrection, he leaves the disciples, and is ‘taken up to Heaven’ in the cloud that always signals the presence of the Deity. He rejoins the Father, and sends the Holy Spirit; but he is still with them, with us, till the end of time. What Paul tells us in the letter to the Colossians is that through the gift of the Meshiach, and through the action of the Holy Spirit, we are united to Him even unto his presence in the Trinity. This, I think, is what it means that our life is hid with Christ in God. If we entrust ourselves completely to him, he draws us up to him within the Trinity, within the presence of God. And that life, then, is our ‘eternal life’, as Ratzinger explains it: a life no longer subject to time and death.

            The more you ponder this in meditation, the more immense and moving it becomes. It turns everything around. That touching verse, ‘If anyone loves me, he will obey my teaching. My Father will love him, and we will come to him and make our home with him’ (John 14) now glows in both directions: for we are now also invited to make our home with the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. 

            Finally, our life is hid – it is in the worldly sense a secret life, a hidden life. Although it may shine through our eyes, the world of humdrumlies mostly will not recognise it or comprehend it. So we should probably be ready at least to try to explain it, however difficult that may be. But in the meantime, let us taste and savour fully the mystery and the glory that is offered to us.


Image: the Holy Trinity, by Andrei Rublev (c. 1360 - c. 1430)