Total Pageviews

Showing posts with label Eliot. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Eliot. Show all posts

Wednesday, 10 February 2016

ASH WEDNESDAY

I posted this a few years ago, and came across it as I was hunting for the text of Eliot's "Ash Wednesday; it still seems appropriate, if uncomfortable, so I'll re-post it now.


In a longish lifetime I’ve found that I’m never original; so there must be others who have had a peculiar Lent with a shambolic ending. You know who you are. It’s mainly for you that I’m writing this, and of course for myself.
When one gets serious about one’s faith, or mainly so, one of the things one dreams about is a Good Lent. With a little real fasting, with lots of profound prayer, with charity and sharing: a shapely movement of the soul’s days from Ash Wednesday to Easter.  And then reality comes along.
Even when I was young and Lent was not much practiced – except for the St Matthew Passion on Good Friday, a Dutch tradition – I was always exercised about the fact that Christianity had chosen the most glorious time of year, full of bird-song, fields of flowers, trees in bloom, fresh green everywhere, the sap rising, for its gloomiest meditations. As a child and later a teenager I did not feel particularly sinful, so penitence was hardly a topical concept; I was sorry for what those people had done to Jesus, but when I was introduced to the great 17C Dutch poet Revius’s sonnet “’Twas not the Jews who crucified Thee, Jesu . . . ‘twas I, my Lord, ‘twas I did this to Thee”, my reaction was Well, no, it wasn’t.
When you get older you realise first that maybe it wasn’t but in the circumstances it might well have been: how do I know that had I been a believing Jew or a Routine-bound Roman corporal in Jerusalem on that day I would have had the intelligence and  the courage to stand up against the crowd?
That, however, is not the point of the poem or the meditation it reflects. And as you go deeper into the faith we inherit you come to a new awareness: doing it to anyone is doing it to Him. OK, you and I have not crucified anyone lately, we’re not into torture and murder; but there are many ways of doing the dirty on others, and every one of them comes out of a bag of nails. Giving comfort to a grieving stranger or relative is comforting Him; withholding love from anyone is withholding it from Him.
As you look at your ageing self in the mirror of hindsight, you see a far from beautiful Dorian Gray. So you acquire the dream of a Good Lent that will maybe, with some serious effort, make you ready for Easter. And then, as I said, reality sets in.
Reality provides us with all sorts of distractions, excuses, and daily messes that really muck up our Good Lent. And when Easter rolls around we know that we have not fasted enough, the theological or devotional texts we were going to read remained untouched beyond Chapter 3, our prayer has been subject to John Donne’s distractions even more than usual, we didn’t go and visit that old person in the next street or village we’d promised ourselves we’d see, we didn’t even go to church on Good Friday, our CD player was on the blink so the St Matthew Passion was out, we ended up feeding passing friends from far away, and here we are, supposedly meditating by the tomb in perfect silence like a Victorian painting of the mourning Marys, but in reality shopping for Easter food, hiding eggs, doing e-mail, and a hundred other unworthy things. What a mess.
And then there comes, at the moment when one does pray, a still small voice that says, “That Good Lent you so wanted to have, supposedly for Me – did it occur to you that that was entirely your idea, conceived by and for you? I do not necessarily want your Good Lent any more than I want smoking bulls’ meat on the altar: if you can look at your life and see the bits that really don’t go with my Father’s love, and if that view makes you miserable enough desperately to want Me, Us, to change it (because you now know that you can’t), then, little lad, you will have had a Lent that’s good enough for Me.” And you realise that you have been given a major lesson in humility. And you get ready for Easter’s celebration, with a rather tremulous joy in your heart. 

ὁδὸς ἄνω κάτω μία καὶ ὡυτή
 (The upward way and the downward way are one and the same)



Sunday, 21 December 2014

SO NOW WHAT?




Four weeks; four candles; four winds; four? Jung said that Catholicism was the most psychologically adequate form of Christianity because it had completed the Trinity (three: unstable, tense, male) with a fourth, and a female: the Blessed Virgin Mary. And today, Advent Four, in the RC church is a reprise of the Annunciation. We are so close to Christmas that one is unsure quite to do with Advent Four. Cranmer’s 1549 Collect simply reprises the whole of lurching, blocked human life and its need for direction:

LORDE rayse up (we pray thee) thy power, and come among us, and with great might succour us; that whereas, through our synnes and wickednes, we be sore lette and hindred, thy bountifull grace and mercye, through the satisfaccion of thy sonne our Lord, may spedily deliver us; to whom with thee and the holy gost be honor and glory, worlde without ende. 
 

I like the “raise up thy power and come among us”; yet we mustn’t forget that when He did just that it was to an utterly unimportant couple in inadequate lodgings on a winter’s night far too close to the Solstice for comfort of any kind. He did succour us with great might, but surely not as we would have expected. His bountiful grace and mercy did indeed deliver us and will go on doing so; but once again, not the way we’d expect and probably not the way we should have chosen.

He did and does so per Jesum Christum Dominum nostrum. I have written on that “per” before and may soon do so again; for now, the point is that His intervention on our behalf happens, and only happens, by the mediation of His only-begotten Son, whose birthday we are about to celebrate. Which means that it can come to us only by our focusing our entire being on that person in whom God came into our stupid, fucked-up, messy, criminal world in order to begin setting it right in the only way worth doing.

No, the coup d’état we sometimes long for wouldn’t work. Try to imagine it. There would be mammoth opposition immediately, with media blitzes, tanks, and possibly nukes. No: He looked at what we had made of his experimental little jewel of a planet; He wept; and He decided the only way to rescue us was the hard way. Hard for us; far, far harder for Him. Tiny bit by tiny bit. A million relapses; a million and one gettings-up. Costing, said T.S. Eliot, not less than everything. The point is, He paid the everything first. Doing so, he showed us such staggering, such scary, such disconcerting love that we quickly killed him and have been embarrassed for over 2,000 years since.

As Fr Jean-Kamel said, the good guys among us keep wanting to do something for God. What we have to get used to is that He’s not interested in our gifts: He’s interested in us. He doesn’t want what we can give him: He’s richer than that already. But He wants us. He just wants us to shut up, stop prancing, and let ourselves be loved like the useless, miserable, incorrigible, repellent, only-a-father-could-love-them dickheads we are. And once we get to that remarkable point – knowing we are less than zip, yet flooded with His love -- then we can do something: not for Him, but for the idiot next door, who oddly enough is carrying His image.

Four candles: it’s coming awfully close. Up to us to let it be real: not a rough beast slouching to be born.