This is a year of which many will be glad to see the end. I
see the sentiment everywhere expressed, often profanely. And for this late post
for the Second Week in Advent I was moved to consider the ways in which we
relate to the “time of the world”. There are so many kinds of time we live in,
as someone on French radio, discussing Gilles Deleuze on Proust, said recently;
and what I call the time of the world is one that seems to occupy more people
more of the time than ever.
The “time of the world” is not a measure of time, although years, decades and centuries might be
related to it. Rather, it is “time” in the sense of Zeitgeist, a “spirit of the age” as the Germans call it: an
expression dating from the nineteenth century, and which the sixteenth might have
found bizarre. The sense of a Zeitgeist
seems linked to what we now call communication, which in its modern sense is a
product of the Industrial Revolution, and which participates (and is in part at
the root of) the accelerating J-curve of “rapid social change” which the
Victorians were the first generation to have to confront.
It has continued to accelerate and has now (for the time
being) culminated in the smartphone. This, together with the social networks it
gives us permanent access to, has had the effect of bringing the “time of the
world” into individuals’ lives in ways, and to degrees, never before
experienced. As such it far outstrips newspapers and television. Much, perhaps
too much, has been said about this, and I’ve no wish to repeat it. But it does
change the felt quality of this season of the year. Not its essence, which is
darkness and hope, sorrow and the promise of light; but the felt quality, different as the Wind
Chill Factor makes the felt temperature.
A year such as 2016 has brought to the world a series of
misfortunes, some unavoidable (the hurricane in Haiti), some avoidable (the
Syrian civil war and the American election result – which will soon be seen as
disastrous by all but the few who sit on the pork barrels). And because of the
“time of the world” it appears to have been a uniquely ghastly twelvemonth,
spreading gloom all around. Nevertheless.
Nevertheless, the world has not become worse: it still
carries on in its difficult journey from the Fall to the Second Coming, a journey
full of sin and misery but equally full of kindness, generosity, love and hope.
That these last are not felt by many
as part of the “time of the world” shows the degree to which that concept
belongs to the public world and the media that reflect and comment upon it. A
French radio programme, “Carnets de Campagne”, each day interviews founders and
members of local organisations that work on the bases of co-operation and
solidarity: the number of these, and their quality, is astonishing. I shared on
Facebook today the story of Torrington in North Devon and its experience with
child refugees. In a little-repeated story, France in the last 10 months has
seen anti-semitic and anti-Moslem acts diminish by ca. 60% from the year
before. And virtually all of us personally know people who, at whatever level,
make the world a little better.
At this time of the year, I propose placing “the time of the
world” in perspective by more attention to two other dimensions: the “time of
our lives” and the “time of eternity”. The Time of our Lives is what happens to
us personally. It may be fraught with difficulty and danger, but it is our time, to savour and to deal with and
to improve. And if, as also often happens, it is a time of happiness, joy or
even prosperity, we should not let the Time of the World embitter that. The
Time of our Lives is the time in which we can be kind, generous, positively
effective and spread comfort and joy.
And the “time of eternity”? That is God’s paradox: dark and
difficult, we tend to think until we remember that those supposed to understand
it best are little children. It is the time which eternity underlies; the time
which eternity penetrates; the time which eternity suffuses and lights with a
glow that is permanent, if only intermittently perceived. It is the time of
faith, of hope, and of love, at the smallest level (a child grasping its
parent’s hand without looking) and at the greatest level, a dimension far
beyond our understanding. That is God’s paradox, totally incorporated in the apparently
simple phrase “Our Father which art in Heaven” – which always makes me catch my
breath, when I think of Hubble’s view of a corner of the Universe: the Creator
and Father of that, all that, is here
in this room and hears my prayer?
Stupendous. And quite enough for two candles.
