Total Pageviews
Thursday, 26 November 2015
ABUN D'BISHMAYYA -- NOT TO BE MISSED
I had been meditating on the Lord's Prayer and its curious optatives; then, browsing a little further, I came upon a remarkable little video from the Talmidi Jewish community, which gives a reconstruction of the prayer in Galilean Aramaic, the dialect Jesus spoke. It's a reconstruction, because no original version of it in the language is known; but it is borne out by one or two other specialist websites and seems accurate. The prayer as reconstructed here and then re-translated seems to me not only quite beautiful but entirely acceptable to a Christian -- indeed, as the speaker says, it clears away a few bumps that those dealing with the traditional Greek-based Christian version stumble over. I particularly like both his view of the prayer's twofold organisation and his explanation of the final three petitions. Here is the link. I'll return to the optatives in my next.
Labels:
accuser,
adversary,
Aramaic,
bread,
earth,
evil,
Galilean Aramaic,
Lord's Prayer,
trial
Wednesday, 25 November 2015
FROM A RUGGED AND THOROUGHLY MODERN MYSTIC
Thomas Merton in his handbuilt Kentucky hermitage
"We are living in a world that is absolutely transparent, and God is shining through it all the time. God manifests Himself everywhere, in everything - in people and in things and in nature and in events. The only thing is we don't see it...I have no program for this seeing. It is only given. But the gate of heaven is everywhere.
My Lord, God, I have no idea where I am going. I do not see the road ahead of me. I cannot know for certain where it will end. The fact that I think I am following Your will does not mean that I am actually doing so. But I believe that the desire to please You does, in fact, please You. And I know that if I do this, You will lead me by the right road, though I may know nothing about it. Therefore, I will trust You always, though I may seem to be lost and in the shadow of death, I will not fear. For you are ever with me; and You will never leave me to face my perils alone."
Thomas Merton
Labels:
dangers,
death,
fear,
God's presence,
God's will,
perils,
Thomas Merton,
will
Saturday, 14 November 2015
TENEBRAE
John Howe, The Dark Tower
Dark days; and the terror is faceless.
War, and not war: as a scholar put it on French radio, ‘You
cannot make war on terrorists; but they can make war on us.’
It is both sobering and useful, in times like these, to read
with some care a couple of Prayer Book collects. The first is the Second
Collect at Matins, and reads:
O God, who art the author of peace and lover of concord, in
knowledge of whom standeth our eternal life, whose service is perfect freedom:
defend us thy humble servants in all assaults of our enemies; that we, surely
trusting in thy defence, may not fear the power of any adversaries; through the
might of Jesus Christ our Lord.
The second is the Second Collect for Evensong, which reads:
O God, from whom all holy desires, all good counsels, and
all just works do proceed: give unto thy servants that peace which the world
cannot give; that both our hearts may be set to obey thy commandments, and also
that by thee we being defended from the fear of our enemies may pass our time
in rest and quietness; through the merits of Jesus Christ our Saviour.
I have long noted, and am now reminded, that in neither
Collect do we pray for the destruction of our enemies, nor even that their
assaults may not occur. In both Collects what we ask to be defended against is
fear: ‘that we . . .may not fear the power of any adversaries’, and
that we ‘being defended from the fear of
our enemies’ may obtain rest and quietness – or, as another Collect puts
it, be enabled ‘to serve Thee with a quiet mind.’ A peace which the world cannot give.
This is, as the media have reminded us, more easily said
than done; but then, we are not asked to conquer the fear of our enemies
ourselves. We pray that we may be defended, in the assaults of our enemies, by
God; and defended, not from those assaults, but from fear.
God’s defence is absolute but peculiar. St Stephen had it,
but he was stoned to death. Dietrich Bonhoeffer had it, but he was hanged with
piano wire. Whatever God’s defence is, it is clearly not what we think or would
normally desire. Is it, then, simply courage we are asking for: the courage to
submit to atrocities without fear? If that were so, we should be no different
from a pagan warrior, or an Islamist kamikaze praying just before he blows up
himself and dozens of innocents. Courage is a great good and a noble virtue,
but in itself it is as pagan as it is Christian.
No, there is another prayer to be added to those Collects,
and Cranmer did not write it. Had he done so, it might have been something like
this:
O Lord our heavenly father, who in the passion of thy Son
Jesus Christ commanded and taught us to pardon our enemies and to love them
that hate us; grant to them, we beseech thee, a true conversion, and to us the
courage to conquer all hatred; through Jesus Christ our Lord.
It is this Collect, or one very like it, that I should love and
hope to hear in many churches tomorrow, and often.
Rubens, the Flagellation of Christ
Labels:
anxiety,
attacks,
conversion,
defence,
enemies,
faith,
fear,
forgiveness,
hatred,
Passion of Christ,
peace,
suffering,
terror,
terrorism
Friday, 13 November 2015
WISDOM'S POETRY
"and sweetly doth she order all things"
I came across this passage in French in Prions en Eglise the other day and found it moving. It occurred to me that, having been brought up Protestant, I had never read the Book of Wisdom, deuterocanonical and very fine. The passage below, an exquisite poem in praise of Wisdom (here in the King James version), might be a description of the Holy Spirit.
For wisdom, which is the worker of all things, taught me:
for in her is an understanding spirit holy, one only, manifold, subtil, lively,
clear, undefiled, plain, not subject to hurt, loving the thing that is good
quick, which cannot be letted [resisted], ready to do good,
Kind to man, steadfast, sure, free from care, having all
power, overseeing all things, and going through all understanding, pure, and
most subtil, spirits.
For wisdom is more moving than any motion: she passeth and
goeth through all things by reason of her pureness.
For she is the breath of the power of God, and a pure
influence flowing from the glory of the Almighty: therefore can no defiled
thing fall into her.
For she is the brightness of the everlasting light, the
unspotted mirror of the power of God, and the image of his goodness.
And being but one, she can do all things: and remaining in
herself, she maketh all things new: and in all ages entering into holy souls, she
maketh them friends of God, and prophets.
For God loveth none but him that dwelleth with wisdom.
For she is more beautiful than the sun, and above all the
order of stars: being compared with the light, she is found before it.
For after this [light] cometh night: but vice shall not prevail
against wisdom.
Wisdom reacheth from one end to another mightily: and sweetly
doth she order all things.
Hat tip to Wisdom Square for the image.
Hat tip to Wisdom Square for the image.
Thursday, 5 November 2015
HATE SPEECH?
Cosimo Rosselli, 'The Sermon on the Mount'
`If any one doth come unto me, and doth not hate his own
father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brothers, and sisters, and yet
even his own life, he is not able to be my disciple; and whoever
doth not bear his cross, and come after me, is not able to be my disciple.’
(Luke 14:26-7; today's Gospel.)
There is no way around it: J.B. Phillips, in his modern New
Testament translation, put quotation marks around ‘hate’, but the Greek verb is
uncompromising. This is one of Jesus’ more rebarbative sayings, one of those we
would rather forget; the more as the current Church insists that every believer
should be a mathètès, a disciple. So,
we say, what about the man and wife who are to be one flesh? We are to love the
little ones, the children – just not our children? We are to honour our
parents, yet hate them?
The saying goes, of course, with Jesus’ snarky reaction to
his mother and brothers’ coming to visit him: ‘Who are my mother and my
brothers? . . . These are mother and my brothers’, pointing to the disciples (Mt 12:46-7); and Matthew 19:29, where anyone who leaves everything (home,
father, mother, sisters, brothers, wife, and property) to follow him will
receive a hundredfold return and eternal
life. Extreme, also: still, giving up is less than hating.
How do we deal with such a saying? One way is to say that
Jesus, in his humanity, was truly
human (in all things, we are told, except sin), and that thus he was capable of
impatience and irritation as he was of exhaustion and depression. In that
sense, the saying Luke reports comes from a simple, indeed a simplistic, binary
‘love’ and ‘hate’. He does not, in other words, mean the verb literally. (Hence
Phillips’ quotation marks.)
Another way of dealing with it is to remember that ‘Matthew’
was part of the early Church, and that his Gospel, like the other Synoptics,
doesn’t want only to recount Jesus’s sayings and doings in great accuracy but
is engaged, as part of the Church, in building an edifice for those who have
not been there, and future generations, to live in. The extreme terms, then, are those of a community
that has to deal with members who regularly privilege their private affairs
over those of the ecclesia.
Leaving history aside, though, we need to know how we are to deal with these words. And there, I think, another passage from
Matthew comes to our aid. This comes in the discourse on the lilies of the
field that toil not, neither do they spin, yet Solomon in all his glory was not
arrayed like one of these. Therefore take no thought for the morrow, says
Jesus: but ‘seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all
these things shall be added unto you.’ (Matthew 6:33)
Here, I think, may be the key to our passage of hate.
Hyperbole aside, we need to concentrate on the kingdom (basileia, perhaps better translated the ‘kingship’, the reign) of
God: both on recognising it in Jesus, who is
the Kingdom, and in bringing it about in the world where he is no longer
physically present. ‘Seeking first’ is beginning the day with the prayer that
we may do His will that day, and that we may not forget that by lunchtime. (The
noontime Angelus is a good reminder.) It’s not a matter of hating A, but of
going all out to pursue B – in which case, if A gets in the way, you brush A
aside impatiently – which, to A, may feel like hate but isn’t. (And in any
case, it only happens if A gets in the way.)
And, he says, if we do so; if all
we consciously care about is doing His will, is living His kingship; why, then
our parents, our spouse, our children, our property, ‘will be added unto us’,
will be there, but as gifts, not
earnings, and thus all the more precious. Not only will we find what we seek,
i.e. the kingdom of God, but we will find ourselves showered with all those
other good things that we thought we had but didn’t really until now, when we
receive them all over again, as God’s gifts. And eternal life as well.
One final thought: on the way to the kingdom of God, on the way of our pursuit, there may well be a cross. And that we cannot, must not brush aside: for He is the kingdom, and it is from the Cross that He reigns. At the very least there is death, for all of us; for some there is great suffering. But among the gifts we receive there is Resurrection -- Zoèn aionion, eternal life.
Labels:
children,
Cross,
discipleship,
eternal life,
hate,
hate speech,
Kingdom of God,
kingship,
parents,
reign,
seeking,
spouses
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)