I have updated this post from 3 1/2 years ago, because I still like it.
St Mary's Church, Kersey, Suffolk
IT’s 2018. I HAVE JUST BEEN APPOINTED ARCHBISHOP OF CANTERBURY.
Oh dear. Now what? I have an
indeterminate term ahead of me, I am about to be appointed by the Sovereign,
and I need to know what to do to, for, and with the 77 million Anglicans of
whom I will soon be the titular spiritual head. Not in any authoritative sense,
for, true to traditional Anglican muddle, Canterbury is in no way a Pope. He
has no power; he has no authority other than moral and traditional; he cannot
order much and can command less. And nowadays, most Anglicans will be sure to
disagree with him vehemently on almost all issues they consider important. So?
This has its good points, too.
Canterbury can, if he likes, be individual, eccentric, and stubborn; and if he
is seen to have a touch of holiness, or even greatness, he may get away with
it. Rowan Williams, on the other hand, showed us all exactly what to avoid when
he said that any successor of his should proceed ‘with a Bible in one hand and
a newspaper in the other’. Under that reportedly saintly man, the Church let
its agenda be set by the media, and was thus always seen to be behind. Michael
Ramsey, who admittedly lived in the prehistoric age Before Twitter, is a better
example. When asked by a bratty Oxford undergraduate ‘Your Grace, what’s wrong
with the Church of England?’ he murmured not one word about sex, gender, or
LGBT, but said crisply, ‘It doesn’t preach enough.’
So here I am, with two short months
before my intronisation, and some serious praying to do. I’ll start with Don
Camillo. That only slightly fictitious Italian parish priest talked frequently
with the crucified Christ on the wall of his church, and dealt with local
ex-virgins and would-be Communists on the strength of it. We may think him
pawky, but those conversations will, I suspect, be a good way to start. Right,
Lord?
What (few will ask because most
think they know) is wrong with the Church of England? And those other churches
in our Communion? I’d begin by showing people what’s right. It is a national
Church, and one of the few; because it has the vocation to be a national
Church, it cannot hide itself in a comfy closed doctrinal closet but must worry
the issues until they succumb. It is on the whole a tolerant Church, a
reasonably kindly Church, an unpretentious Church, a Church that functions best
when assembling many people of different points if view for a liturgy of Matins
or Communion followed by coffee or sherry, and cake.
It is not good at taking positions
on knotty problems beloved by television talk-show hosts. It is not good at
dealing with morals beyond the Great Commandments. It is not good at being
Cool. It is not good at being political. It is not good at being Progressive,
or Liberal, or Conservative. It is not good at being Ecological or Diverse.
So I think that I will not try to
be any of those things. Journalists with microphones and enormous cameras will
try to make me, and I will prepare a few good one-liners to send them home
with. But I will not bite.
Instead, I will surprise them. I
will give each of Britain’s parishes the choice of being, like the hexes in Jack
Chalker’s Well World novels, Wild, Half-Wild, or Tame, the choice to be made by
all members in a parish referendum. Wild parishes will permit everything, from
gay marriage to djembe-rock services; Half-Wild will choose from a small list
which changes they will adopt, but will then be stuck with those for twelve
years before a review; Tame parishes will be traditional (and BCP) in every
way, whether Low, High, or Broad. Once those choices are made, I will put a
twelve-year moratorium on all discussions of ‘modernization’, whether of
morality or of liturgy, in the Church.
The place of these will be taken by
an enormous effort of spirituality, accompanied (but not replaced) by active
charity. Discussion will be allowed of matters of theology, but not encouraged:
I will try to steer my fractious Church in the direction of being a praying
Church rather than a forum for disagreement. I will put huge effort into
encouraging vocations, both priestly and religious, and maintain and encourage
all Anglican religious orders. Since my appointment coincides with the 350th
anniversary of the Restoration (1668) Prayer Book, I will direct that for one
year it be used in all prime-time parish services, with Common Worship
relegated for that time to 8 a.m. I will institute part-time seminars on
preaching for all Church of England rectors and curates, and encourage longer,
text-based sermons in all Sunday services.
An easily-overlooked feature of
these changes is that they are low-cost financially. On that front, I will
encourage a new form of tithing compatible with high taxation, and I will
appoint a committee to study the feasibility of part-time curates. I will
encourage Government to increase its assistance in maintaining historic
churches and their fabric, and encourage the creation of lay readers and Matins
and Evensong services led by them.
Finally, I will initiate a large
effort of promulgating the knowledge of Anglican spirituality and its history,
including the lives of persons to be venerated; I will institute popular
courses on the thought of Hooker and Burnet, on the sermons of Donne and
Newman (even though he left for Rome), and on the poetry of Herbert and Watts.